Time to read: 9 minutes
How mono-material packaging improves sustainability in FMCG industries?
By: Gustavo Morais & Marta Clavero
With the 2025 sustainable packaging commitments just a few years away, innovative recyclable solutions such as mono-material solutions could be the way forward, thanks to new developments that deliver some of the benefits of traditional multi-material coverings.
Mono-materials offer a crucial solution to bridging the circularity gap in the flexible packaging sector. Since they are easier to recycle than multi-material, multi-layer packaging, less material ends up in landfill.
This article explores the growth of mono-material flexible packaging and outlines their sustainability benefits while evaluating the key challenges for producers when it comes to processing.
Understanding the different types of flexible packaging
Flexible packaging is quite simply a container or package that is capable of being bent, folded or shaped without breakage. In other words, these packages protect their contents from dust, moisture, mould and other environmental contaminants while maintaining product quality and shelf life. They are usually lightweight, cost-effective and malleable.
Such packages are typically made from multiple layers, so the overall effect combines the benefits of each monolayer, including strength, storage and stability. These benefits are of great importance to sectors such as food, beverage, cosmetics, personal care and pharmaceuticals, where flexible multi-layer packaging is widely used.
Overall, there are two main kinds of flexible multi-layer or composite product packaging.
Mono-material structures may be made from up to three layers of from the same family matrix. They do not need an adhesive to bond them and can be easily recycled because all layers are made from the same plastic.
Find out more about the benefits of flexible packaging with multi-layer structures.
How mono-materials promote recyclability in packaging?
Accompanying that increase in volume will be a corresponding rise in the need for recyclability, as well as innovation and investment to achieve a circular economy.
Thus far, flexible plastic packaging has been made from complex, multi-material materials as companies have prioritised function, versatility and cost. Up until recently, recyclability has rarely been a consideration in the design of flexible packaging.
It is now evident that recycling multi-material structures can be both difficult and time-consuming. In order to obtain high-quality recycled products, such packages must be separated into their constituent elements so that each layer can follow its own recycling processes.
Recycling mono-material packaging
The process is simpler with mono-material solutions. Since mono-material packages are composed of a single material or fibre, the recycling process is quicker and easier than other products made of multiple plastics or mixed with other materials such as cardboard or glass. Similarly, less energy is needed to separate the various constituent materials. The increased efficiency in recycling mono-materials also delivers time and cost benefits.
Against this requirement, the demand for mono-material flexible polymer packaging is expected to grow the market to 26.03 million tonnes valued at $71 billion in 2025, according to a recent report by market intelligence firm Smithers[2]. That’s against an aggregate of 21.51 million tonnes valued at $58.9 billion in 2020, or a CAGR of 3.8% over the period.
This growth in demand for more sustainable solutions to meet expectations from brand owners and consumers will be especially relevant in industries such as the food, confectionery, personal care and pharmaceutical sectors.
Types of mono-material solutions
Material |
Type of mono-material structure |
Characteristics |
Circularity benefits / Recyclability |
Industrial use |
Polypropylene (PP) |
Monolayer |
Lightweight and transparent thermoplastic that resists moisture |
Fully recyclable and reusable |
Film |
Oriented Polypropylene (OPP), Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) and Cast Polypropylene (CPP) |
Multilayer |
Lightweight, transparent and hygienic films that support overprinting |
A combination of these films can replace mixed-material laminates such as those with paper, PET or alufoil |
Food film packaging |
Polyethylene (PE) |
Monolayer or multilayer |
Lightweight, heat and moisture resistant, transparent, durable and flexible |
Easy to recycle as a mono-material |
Represents half the global packaging market through film packaging, medical & health, pipes & fittings, household products, agriculture, and wiring & cable |
Machine-direction orientation (MDO) + Polyethylene (PE) |
Monolayer or multilayer |
MDO improves the key properties of the PE film (as above), while matching the properties of PET and PA films |
Environmentally friendly and recyclable |
Food & beverages, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, personal care, homecare |
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) |
Monolayer |
Transparent, easily extrudable, low temperature and chemical resistance |
100% recyclable |
Food, healthcare |
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) |
Monolayer. Recent developments allow mono-material packaging from this mono polymer |
Lightweight and transparent |
100% recyclable and versatile |
Food & beverages, cosmetics |
Biaxially-oriented polyethylene terephthalate (BoPET) |
Monolayer |
Lightest weight and lowest cost per pack |
Lowest CO2 footprint. Mixed plastic laminates based on BoPET films are compatible in most feedstock recycling processes |
Represents up to 25% of all current flexible packaging, including 11% of food film packaging demand |
Polyamide (PA) |
Monolayer and multilayer |
High heat and mechanical resistance, strong tensile strength, high optical properties, with strong oxygen and other barrier properties |
Recyclable |
Perishable foods |
Polystyrene |
Monolayer. Can be used as a solid plastic and as a foam |
Thermoplastic, lightweight and flexible |
100% recyclable |
Food service containers, insulation, protective packaging |
Global demand of mono-material films in food packaging
Industrial applications for mono-material solutions
Here, it’s worth noting that mono-material does not mean monolayer. Researchers are working to develop solutions that bring the benefits of multilateral multilayer structures to mono-material packaging. Such ‘in-between’ or alternative solutions are now available in the form of mono-material multi-layer materials.
At IMCD, we can offer technical support on the design and product selection to move to high-tech mono-material solutions.
Below are some examples of the way IMCD works with mono-material packaging.
1. MDO can reconcile temperature challenges for heat sealing and printing
Consider the case of a pouch made from a printed film uses several layers. PET, OPP and OPA form the printed layer, in addition to an adhesive, while a PE layer works as a sealant.
Proposed solutions in such a case include modifying PP or PE substitutes by changing the direction of their orientation. The process modifies the material’s properties allowing the same polymer to be used in a multi-layer structure that is 100% recyclable.
2. Improving monolayer structures with barrier coatings to improve oxygen barriers
Oxygen barrier properties can present a significant technological challenge for monolayer structures.
In such cases, applying a primer or barrier coating layer to polyolefin materials goes a long way to improving the barrier properties of the initial polymer. Doing so allows these structures to achieve the desired high-tech properties as in the case of providing a good oxygen barrier within the mono-material structural framework.
According to current standards, if a structure has more than 90% of polyolefins, it can be considered mono-material.
IMCD offers different coating options to support this solution.
3. Redesigning PA-free structures to promote circularity
PA has been widely used in deep thermoforming, as it serves as an excellent barrier and offers puncture-resistant performance.
When it comes to circularity, however, separating out the PA component becomes a challenge. Instead, the use of specific and modified polyolefins (PE) with a low amount of EVOH and ties resins (less than 5-10%) can help packers to meet their packaging recyclability goals while maintaining the required barrier levels.
Tackling challenges around using mono-materials in flexible packaging
However, there are several challenges associated with switching from multi-material packaging to mono-material replacements.
Perhaps the most significant challenge concerns packaging design. Consumers, brands and retailers now all expect packaging that both extends product shelf life and is sustainable. Meeting these needs with mono-material options may require significant redesign if barrier and mechanical functionality is not to be compromised. Continued research and development in the field is seeing these limitations being overcome. For instance, polymer adhesives are being substituted with coating solutions, which eliminates the need for additional materials or layers while enhancing barrier protection.
At the same time, design limitations are also being surmounted. While mono polymers have traditionally been seen as compromising on packaging design and aesthetics, new plastic mono-materials have changed the game. The use of plastic foam, for instance, has extended design possibilities for manufacturers in new ways.
Outlook for mono-material packaging
Enterprise commitments to sustainable packaging have centred on 100% of packaging being reusable, recyclable or compostable by 2025. With such a short goal window, governments are enacting regulations and levying plastic fees to incentivize investments in recycling.
How can your business benefit from mono-material packaging solutions? Speak to an IMCD consultant today.
References:
1. Flexible Plastic Packaging Market Global Forecast to 2025. MarketsandMarkets
2. Easy-to-Recycle Mono-Material Film Packs to Grow at 3.8% to Reach $71 Billion in 2025. Smithers
3. AMI